Audits whether AI crawlers can actually read your site: robots.txt access for GPTBot and Perplexity, llms.txt presence and quality, structured data, and whether your raw HTML holds real content or an empty SPA shell invisible to any crawler that doesn't execute JavaScript. The technical readiness layer, before content or positioning ever enters the picture.
Most sites have no idea whether GPTBot, Perplexity, or Claude's crawler can actually read their content, or whether it's an empty JavaScript shell to any crawler that doesn't execute it.
Audited this exact site (telemeterstrategy.com) against a synthetic unoptimized single-page app with no llms.txt, no schema, and a JS-only shell.
87/100
This site scored
25/100
Unoptimized SPA scored
4
Checks run
The scoring differentiates a real site from a fake one instead of returning the same reassuring number regardless of input.
Yes. It scored this site 87/100 against a synthetic unoptimized single-page app that scored 25/100, and honestly flagged the one real gap it found.
The technical readiness layer comes first; content and positioning work builds on top of it once crawlers can actually read the site.
Runs against your CRM using your own credentials, through your own AI instance. We don't copy, store, or retain your data.